Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Search
  • Get Qt Extensions
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. General talk
  3. The Lounge
  4. Recurring C++ and Qt anti-patterns
Forum Updated to NodeBB v4.3 + New Features

Recurring C++ and Qt anti-patterns

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
126 Posts 17 Posters 69.9k Views 10 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Kent-DorfmanK Offline
    Kent-DorfmanK Offline
    Kent-Dorfman
    wrote on last edited by
    #42

    @fcarney said in Recurring C++ and Qt anti-patterns:

        int 🥩=1;
        int 🧀=1;
        int 🥬=1;
        int 🍞=1;
        int 🍅=1;
        int 🥪=🥩+🥬+🍅+🧀+🥩;
        cout << 🥪 << endl;
    

    Fails to compile in C++17...

    What's this "int" stuff? Doesn't the 17 standard deduce the type based on the rvalue? Not that I think that is necessarily a good thing though.

    fcarneyF 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • Kent-DorfmanK Kent-Dorfman

      @fcarney said in Recurring C++ and Qt anti-patterns:

          int 🥩=1;
          int 🧀=1;
          int 🥬=1;
          int 🍞=1;
          int 🍅=1;
          int 🥪=🥩+🥬+🍅+🧀+🥩;
          cout << 🥪 << endl;
      

      Fails to compile in C++17...

      What's this "int" stuff? Doesn't the 17 standard deduce the type based on the rvalue? Not that I think that is necessarily a good thing though.

      fcarneyF Offline
      fcarneyF Offline
      fcarney
      wrote on last edited by
      #43

      @kent-dorfman said in Recurring C++ and Qt anti-patterns:

      🍞

      The real problem is this variable is unused.

      C++ is a perfectly valid school of magic.

      1 Reply Last reply
      1
      • Kent-DorfmanK Offline
        Kent-DorfmanK Offline
        Kent-Dorfman
        wrote on last edited by
        #44

        @fcarney said in Recurring C++ and Qt anti-patterns:

        The real problem is this variable is unused.

        So in 17 unused variables are errors instead of warnings?

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • fcarneyF Offline
          fcarneyF Offline
          fcarney
          wrote on last edited by
          #45

          @kent-dorfman said in Recurring C++ and Qt anti-patterns:

          So in 17 unused variables are errors instead of warnings?

          No, its just a bug in the code for a samich.

          C++ is a perfectly valid school of magic.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • Kent-DorfmanK Offline
            Kent-DorfmanK Offline
            Kent-Dorfman
            wrote on last edited by
            #46

            @fcarney said in Recurring C++ and Qt anti-patterns:

            No, its just a bug in the code for a samich.

            Samich... Are you a yinzer?

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • fcarneyF Offline
              fcarneyF Offline
              fcarney
              wrote on last edited by
              #47

              @kent-dorfman said in Recurring C++ and Qt anti-patterns:

              Are you a yinzer?

              Had to look it up. Based on what I read, no. Not sure where I heard sandwich being called samich though. I am in western USA.

              C++ is a perfectly valid school of magic.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • Chris KawaC Online
                Chris KawaC Online
                Chris Kawa
                Lifetime Qt Champion
                wrote on last edited by
                #48

                Being an a-hole as a recruiter:

                What does o() mean?
                What does o.o mean?
                What does o->o mean?
                What does o-->o mean?
                What does o()--<=>--o() mean? Fun fact - crashes MSVC (yes, the compiler, not the compiled program)
                What does [](){;o()++<=>++o();}() mean?

                J.HilkJ 1 Reply Last reply
                3
                • Chris KawaC Chris Kawa

                  I had to dig through this thing once, only the real code was like a hundred times longer and more convoluted.

                  // Library.h statically linked to and included in DLL and EXE
                  struct SomeType
                  {
                     int typeId();
                  };
                  Q_DECLARE_METATYPE(SomeType);
                  
                  // Library.cpp
                  int SomeType::typeId()
                  {
                      return qMetaTypeId<SomeType>();
                  }
                  
                  // main app
                  SomeType& var1 = getItFromDLL();
                  SomeType& var2 = getItFromEXE();
                  
                  bool same = var1.typeId() == var2.typeId(); // nope
                  

                  Pretty ugly thing to debug, especially since once in blue moon it actually works :/

                  kshegunovK Offline
                  kshegunovK Offline
                  kshegunov
                  Moderators
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #49

                  @chris-kawa said in Recurring C++ and Qt anti-patterns:

                  I had to dig through this thing once, only the real code was like a hundred times longer and more convoluted.
                  [Snip]
                  Pretty ugly thing to debug, especially since once in blue moon it actually works :/

                  Indeed. Although, this is windows specific. It works correctly on Linux as the symbol resolution happens at run time.

                  Read and abide by the Qt Code of Conduct

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  1
                  • Chris KawaC Chris Kawa

                    Being an a-hole as a recruiter:

                    What does o() mean?
                    What does o.o mean?
                    What does o->o mean?
                    What does o-->o mean?
                    What does o()--<=>--o() mean? Fun fact - crashes MSVC (yes, the compiler, not the compiled program)
                    What does [](){;o()++<=>++o();}() mean?

                    J.HilkJ Offline
                    J.HilkJ Offline
                    J.Hilk
                    Moderators
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #50

                    @chris-kawa wow, some of those you don't encounter every day...


                    Be aware of the Qt Code of Conduct, when posting : https://forum.qt.io/topic/113070/qt-code-of-conduct


                    Q: What's that?
                    A: It's blue light.
                    Q: What does it do?
                    A: It turns blue.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • Chris KawaC Online
                      Chris KawaC Online
                      Chris Kawa
                      Lifetime Qt Champion
                      wrote on last edited by Chris Kawa
                      #51

                      Yeah, it was a bit out of topic. Here's one anti-pattern I encounter something like 9/10 code reviews:

                      auto widget = new SomeWidget(some_widget);
                      auto layout = new SomeLayout(some_other_widget);
                      layout->addWidget(widget);
                      

                      It's not a correctness bug. It's a subtle performance one. Compare this with:

                      auto widget = new SomeWidget();
                      auto layout = new SomeLayout();
                      layout->addWidget(widget);
                      some_other_widget->setLayout(layout);
                      

                      If you don't see it - count how many times parents need to be changed and imagine there's not one but, say, 50 widgets and layouts.
                      For extra sweetness do the same when the parent widget is visible - how many times layouts need to be recalculated?

                      jsulmJ 1 Reply Last reply
                      6
                      • Chris KawaC Chris Kawa

                        Yeah, it was a bit out of topic. Here's one anti-pattern I encounter something like 9/10 code reviews:

                        auto widget = new SomeWidget(some_widget);
                        auto layout = new SomeLayout(some_other_widget);
                        layout->addWidget(widget);
                        

                        It's not a correctness bug. It's a subtle performance one. Compare this with:

                        auto widget = new SomeWidget();
                        auto layout = new SomeLayout();
                        layout->addWidget(widget);
                        some_other_widget->setLayout(layout);
                        

                        If you don't see it - count how many times parents need to be changed and imagine there's not one but, say, 50 widgets and layouts.
                        For extra sweetness do the same when the parent widget is visible - how many times layouts need to be recalculated?

                        jsulmJ Offline
                        jsulmJ Offline
                        jsulm
                        Lifetime Qt Champion
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #52

                        @chris-kawa said in Recurring C++ and Qt anti-patterns:

                        auto widget = new SomeWidget(widget);

                        I hope this is a typo :-)

                        https://forum.qt.io/topic/113070/qt-code-of-conduct

                        Chris KawaC 1 Reply Last reply
                        1
                        • jsulmJ jsulm

                          @chris-kawa said in Recurring C++ and Qt anti-patterns:

                          auto widget = new SomeWidget(widget);

                          I hope this is a typo :-)

                          Chris KawaC Online
                          Chris KawaC Online
                          Chris Kawa
                          Lifetime Qt Champion
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #53

                          @jsulm Sure, sorry, fixed :)

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • Kent-DorfmanK Offline
                            Kent-DorfmanK Offline
                            Kent-Dorfman
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #54

                            @chris-kawa said in Recurring C++ and Qt anti-patterns:

                            It's not a correctness bug. It's a subtle performance one. Compare this with:

                            It took me a few minutes but ok, I'm convinced... LOL

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • fcarneyF Offline
                              fcarneyF Offline
                              fcarney
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #55
                              mtime.toString(tr("M/d/yyyy hh:mm AP"));
                              

                              C++ is a perfectly valid school of magic.

                              aha_1980A 1 Reply Last reply
                              2
                              • fcarneyF fcarney
                                mtime.toString(tr("M/d/yyyy hh:mm AP"));
                                
                                aha_1980A Offline
                                aha_1980A Offline
                                aha_1980
                                Lifetime Qt Champion
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #56

                                Hi @fcarney,

                                mtime.toString(tr("M/d/yyyy hh:mm AP"));

                                OMG. Yeah, that's a good (bad) one :)

                                Qt has to stay free or it will die.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • fcarneyF Offline
                                  fcarneyF Offline
                                  fcarney
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #57

                                  Just created this pattern today:

                                  if(condition == somevalue)
                                  somestatement.append(whatever);
                                  

                                  I forgot the indentation so it didn't look like and if statement.
                                  I I know this is really simple and not an error/bad practice. It is more a readability issue.

                                  Going to be more rigorous in the future:

                                  if(condition == somevalue){
                                      somestatement.append(whatever);
                                  }
                                  

                                  C++ is a perfectly valid school of magic.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  2
                                  • SGaistS Offline
                                    SGaistS Offline
                                    SGaist
                                    Lifetime Qt Champion
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #58

                                    Well, that one made a big security hole in Apple's authentication code but it was the other way around, several lines under the if without curly brackets.

                                    Interested in AI ? www.idiap.ch
                                    Please read the Qt Code of Conduct - https://forum.qt.io/topic/113070/qt-code-of-conduct

                                    aha_1980A 1 Reply Last reply
                                    3
                                    • fcarneyF Offline
                                      fcarneyF Offline
                                      fcarney
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #59

                                      Wow, okay, I take it back. Bad pattern!

                                      C++ is a perfectly valid school of magic.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • SGaistS SGaist

                                        Well, that one made a big security hole in Apple's authentication code but it was the other way around, several lines under the if without curly brackets.

                                        aha_1980A Offline
                                        aha_1980A Offline
                                        aha_1980
                                        Lifetime Qt Champion
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #60

                                        @SGaist I've seen GCC 7.3 warning about exactly this problem ("thif if clause ... does not guard ...").

                                        So hopefully such problems will go away sooner than later.

                                        Regards

                                        Qt has to stay free or it will die.

                                        kshegunovK 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • aha_1980A aha_1980

                                          @SGaist I've seen GCC 7.3 warning about exactly this problem ("thif if clause ... does not guard ...").

                                          So hopefully such problems will go away sooner than later.

                                          Regards

                                          kshegunovK Offline
                                          kshegunovK Offline
                                          kshegunov
                                          Moderators
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #61

                                          Nope. It warns if it doesn't actually guard (as if you had put incidentally ; at the end of the if):

                                          if (something)
                                          something else;
                                          something else else; //< Can't warn about that
                                          

                                          Read and abide by the Qt Code of Conduct

                                          aha_1980A 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0

                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups
                                          • Search
                                          • Get Qt Extensions
                                          • Unsolved