Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Search
  • Get Qt Extensions
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Behind the Scenes
  3. Qt.io webservices
  4. What is going with this spam detection here?
QtWS25 Last Chance

What is going with this spam detection here?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Solved Qt.io webservices
spam
21 Posts 7 Posters 8.0k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • S SGaist
    12 Mar 2016, 21:15

    Ok after a quick test, the includes themselves are innocent. It's the < > signs that triggers the detection. I think they might detected as html tags. A simple fix for that is to tell markdown that you are writing C++. Simply add c++ after the three ` when you write a code block and you're good to go.

    K Offline
    K Offline
    kshegunov
    Moderators
    wrote on 13 Mar 2016, 00:49 last edited by
    #12

    @SGaist

    It's the < > signs that triggers the detection. I think they might detected as html tags.

    Not all headers trigger the anti-spam plugin. In my investigation from the 10-15 includes only this block appeared to be troublesome. If I had to guess, the combination of <, > and the words debug or object are the prime culprit.

    Kind regards.

    Read and abide by the Qt Code of Conduct

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • S SGaist
      12 Mar 2016, 21:15

      Ok after a quick test, the includes themselves are innocent. It's the < > signs that triggers the detection. I think they might detected as html tags. A simple fix for that is to tell markdown that you are writing C++. Simply add c++ after the three ` when you write a code block and you're good to go.

      J Offline
      J Offline
      Jakob
      wrote on 14 Mar 2016, 12:03 last edited by
      #13

      @SGaist Hm, I tried that - didn't help

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • S SGaist
        11 Mar 2016, 22:19

        Hi,

        Do you have small example that reproduces this ?

        J Offline
        J Offline
        Jakob
        wrote on 14 Mar 2016, 12:04 last edited by
        #14

        @SGaist It is the exact code snippet that is now in the ubuntu paste bin, for which I posted the link.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • J Jakob
          11 Mar 2016, 13:51

          I'm trying to ask a question about a crash I'm seeing with a very small code snippet, but somehow the question is blocked, without any explanation as to why.

          Why? Why?

          J Offline
          J Offline
          Jakob
          wrote on 14 Mar 2016, 12:17 last edited by Jakob
          #15

          I adjusted the title a bit, now that I'm not so frustrated anymore. But in conclusion:

          Number 1: I think it is a very good idea to have some protection on a forum like this.

          However: introducing such a thing, without letting any user of the forum know, apparently without even some of the moderators(!!!!) knowing exactly about the details, to me, is a very, very bad idea. To the user it feels they are not taken seriously, and the maintainers of the forum just do whatever they like. That is a very, very uncomforting feeling to get from a forum in the 'Qt-world', where usually a high standard of professionalism is the standard.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • M Offline
            M Offline
            mrjj
            Lifetime Qt Champion
            wrote on 14 Mar 2016, 12:25 last edited by
            #16

            Hi
            well considering I have posted around 2000 posts and been
            hit 2 times, its not overly aggressive if u ask me :)

            Also its VERY normal not to tell/make public available how to cheat a filter as it
            then stops working very fast.

            Also, it has been here all along. At least since I started. My first "SPAM" was
            like in my first week.

            But I agree. I would be nice to know WHY it triggers on pretty normal code.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • J Offline
              J Offline
              JKSH
              Moderators
              wrote on 4 Apr 2016, 00:24 last edited by
              #17

              Pinging @tekojo -- the false positives with code snippets are still happening :(

              Qt Doc Search for browsers: forum.qt.io/topic/35616/web-browser-extension-for-improved-doc-searches

              T 1 Reply Last reply 4 Apr 2016, 06:04
              0
              • J JKSH
                4 Apr 2016, 00:24

                Pinging @tekojo -- the false positives with code snippets are still happening :(

                T Offline
                T Offline
                tekojo
                wrote on 4 Apr 2016, 06:04 last edited by
                #18

                @JKSH
                Hmm, I thought it was fixed.
                Should be ok now.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • T Offline
                  T Offline
                  tekojo
                  wrote on 4 Apr 2016, 06:08 last edited by
                  #19

                  As for why it hits code snippets... I'm not completely sure. My feeling is that it mistakes them for some sort of scripting attack.

                  To be honest the main type of spam we have had, has mostly been chinese false educational spam and weird korean stuff.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • M Offline
                    M Offline
                    mariakatosvich
                    wrote on 14 Jun 2016, 09:44 last edited by mariakatosvich 9 Aug 2020, 13:32
                    #20

                    I find the rules somewhere, such that I can format the snippet differently?I just have tried myself being told it was spam when trying to post code.
                    Thanks
                    My Expertise - setup nfs server Kubernetes

                    "A pen in the hand of this president is far more dangerous than a gun in the hands of 200 million law-abiding citizens."

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • S Offline
                      S Offline
                      SGaist
                      Lifetime Qt Champion
                      wrote on 14 Jun 2016, 20:01 last edited by
                      #21

                      Hi,

                      I usually append c++ after the opening three back ticks when writing C++ code.

                      Interested in AI ? www.idiap.ch
                      Please read the Qt Code of Conduct - https://forum.qt.io/topic/113070/qt-code-of-conduct

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0

                      • Login

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • Users
                      • Groups
                      • Search
                      • Get Qt Extensions
                      • Unsolved