Brainstorm

Thank you deadbird :)

Thanks, Jens, I posted this same question on StackOverflow. A couple of suggestions from one commenter, (plus about 10 hours of banging my head against my keyboard) and I actually came up with a fairly painless way to achieve this that avoids using the id AND avoids making any assumptions about the internal ancestry of a delegate. Rather than duplicating the solution here, you can read about it there: "Anonymous Access To TableView.":http://stackoverflow.com/questions/23522186/qml-how-to-anonymously-access-to-tableview-from-within-delegates: It's not quite as straightforward as the exposure of the model to the delegate, but it's pretty close. wahynes

The shadow build directory can be set anywhere you want but not in the sources (that would defeat the purpose) You're welcome ! Since it's all good now, please update the thread title prepending [solved] so other forum users may know a solution has been found :)

I see. Thank you for help!

I corrected in the .pro file. Thank you!

[quote author="Clochydd" date="1397405737"]Hi, it will work with an integer variable as well. Make sure, your variable has a content which is represented in your QList - you may want to test it with qDebug() << i;[/quote] It's working. The for loop is running 0-5, but the data for QStringList have 0-4. Thank you for helping!

You're welcome, Please edit the title of your first post and prepend [solved] to it so that others can see easily it in the overview.

It looks like this was never answered. It's strange to me that QAbstractFileEngine was taken out considering Android "assets:" was added, "qrc:" has always been around, and it would be a really seamless way to integrate many things that just can't be integrated at the OS level when you don't have full control over the machine. How is it a "design flaw" to have this interface? Is GDAL VSI flawed? I think that's a matter of opinion, but the fact remains that many libraries have to work with both file and memory APIs. If a library is based on Qt, it would be nice to be able to make an abstract file system and be done with integration.

Thank you alot. I will write you.

I built one library called Tufão: https://github.com/vinipsmaker/tufao

Hi chethan7845, Please post your question in a new thread. It is completely unrelated to this one.

AFAIK currently, on iOS the libraries are built statically. It's at least the result of the default build

I found the problem! Your mask object size must be same as source object. See a sample: @import QtQuick 2.1 import QtGraphicalEffects 1.0 Rectangle { id: root width: 600; height: 450 Rectangle { id: sourceObj anchors.fill: parent Column { anchors.centerIn: parent rotation: -13 Text { text: "Iran advancing science" font { family: "Segoe UI Light"; pixelSize: 32 } } Text { text: "Persia was a cradle of science in earlier times. "+"<br/>"+ "Persia contributed to the current understanding of nature, "+"<br/>"+ "medicine, mathematics, and philosophy. Persians made important "+"<br/>"+ "contributions to algebra and chemistry, invented the wind-power "+"<br/>"+ "machine, and the first distillation of alcohol. " font { family: "Segoe UI Light"; pixelSize: 12 } } } color: "skyblue" visible: false } Rectangle { id: maskObj color: "transparent" //Notice! i want to mask only non-transparent area! anchors.fill: sourceObj //Size must be same as sourceObj Rectangle { id: realMask //<----- This is my real mask width: 313; height: 72 anchors.centerIn: parent color: "red" radius: 36 } visible: false } OpacityMask { id: myEffect source: sourceObj maskSource: maskObj anchors.fill: parent } } @ Good luck!

Thanks for taking out time to help

Hi and welcome to devnet, Sounds like a feature request to me :) If you think it might be a good idea, you can always fill a feature request on the "bug report system":http://bugreports.qt-project.org Or even better, if you already use Geotrans, you could try to give it a nice Qt interface and submit it to the Qt project

Hi, as I said in the other thread, I think your isn't an optimal solution: what's happen if 2 tables aren't enough to show all your data? Could you show a mockup of your solution?

Yes the idea is to have the same qml file ( more or less - I'm still investigating if this is possible ) on each device and each device renders the part for its screen. I think this is easily achievable when the qml has static parts and no animation. I trying to figure out how to make it work when you have animation, simple example: a square that moves horizontally from one to screen to the next... In my example I have a timer that every second moves the rectangle of 10pixel to the right, to make everything work I need to have the two timers of the two devices synchronized... and this is what I'm trying to look in the sources of Qt.... Your idea could be a solution, do you think its feasible? The problem is that when you have a big videowall ( 3x3 or 4x4 ) I don't think a single computer has the power to render at a decent frame rate the whole setup..

Hey, I just made a little research and what I found so far: Watch for an added file with QFileSystemWatcher::directoryChanged and printing with QPrinter. I will now try to use those classes and see how far I can get. I then want to show the file that just has been added to the directory with QImage and QLabel. Is there a better way to do this? The button should then be a QPushButton with set alpha value. I will give it a try :) Thank for any comment :P Best, JRS