Gerrit Contributions
-
@aha_1980 Thanks!
@SGaist and @kshegunov My idea was to pre-configure and even make. That's really the time saving part. The rest can literally be included in a bash file, it's not really that taxing.
@SGaist said in Gerrit Contributions:
provide a docker container
That's actually another great idea
-
As someone that has not used Docker before: it is not as cross-platform as VirtualBox, i.e. you can use a Linux docker only in a Linux environment, not Windows, right?
-
Hi
Dockers can be used in windows too but no gui possible as far as i know.
So VM would be so much more flexible and cross platform.
also dockers requires user to learn how to use them ( new commands, integration etc)
where as WM is still just a normal linux. -
@VRonin said in Gerrit Contributions:
where would it be appropriate to host such a big file?
Don't forget the traffic that is generated when downloading...
For me and my limited networks speed, even downloading such a big file takes several hours.
how often should it be updated and what would be the best way to do it?
Another good one :) For now, I'd set it to the tip of qt5 5.11 branch, so you could do fixes easily and even push something to dev/5.12 with good chance it can be cherry-picked without conflict.
That would mean you'd have to renew it in approx. half a year, when 5.12 is out (Given that the average user downloads no beta releases anyway).
-
Hi
regarding hosting.
How big is image ? -
@VRonin said in Gerrit Contributions:
where would it be appropriate to host such a big file?
No clue, but if you become desperate I can clear you 100-200 GB on my disk, however my connection isn't really that fast (40Mb outgoing).
-
Well
https://www.pcloud.com/
give 20 GB for free.
maybe we can compress it.
I will try to see if i can find their markting person and ask if they could donate
100 GB to Qt forum. -
@kshegunov
That would be great. its super nice service. Much better than dropbox. -
Yeah, unfortunately he said they probably won't be interested. Especially as they can't monetize at all the simple file hosting. They may want to "enforce" usage of their app, but I told him it wouldn't be appropriate in this case. The problem it seems is twofold:
- there's not much gain of providing file hosting from the company's point of view
- file hosting is expensive for them, and they impose very heavy restriction on traffic, which means it's probably not a viable option for our case
I asked for advice on possible other solutions, but he said it's kind of unlikely to find a decent hosting service for free just for file storage - there's not much interest into it from the companies; paid file hosting seems to be best, but costs money.
-
@kshegunov
Ok. so the end of that idea. Thank you for trying
Im pretty sure we can find solution for 50 GB. -
@mrjj said in Gerrit Contributions:
Ok. so the end of that idea. Thank you for trying
That shouldn't stop you from trying to contact their marketing, they may have a different take on it, even if unlikely.
Im pretty sure we can find solution for 50 GB.
Not exactly what I was told, but it doesn't hurt to try. ;)
-
@kshegunov
I asked Joel Bodenmann since he just installed 1000/1000 and bought 16 TB extra ;)
No harm asking.Update:
Joel Bodenmann will host the wm image gladly.
size really not issue.