Brainstorm

Well... I did list some, IMHO, shortcommings of qt-apps.org in my openingpost. However, I am curious about the similar websites you mentioned. Which other websites do you know of that feature Qt components? If there's one that's even remotely good, I'd be more than happy not to start something like this.

From what I've read the consensus is that once a poll is up the various options available are locked so that every voter votes on the same poll. I'm all for that as well.

This topic has been discussed "here":http://developer.qt.nokia.com/forums/viewthread/2754/

I have seen many Developer website in which language change option is at the top most side.

So, any user can access their required data in their language.

chetan, ok, I see. I don't mind such feature, would be great

lupasa: So write some client that communicates with a server. The basics are all in Qt... high level stuff like a framework for application level protocols are of course not part of a standard Qt. So it is definitely possible, but will require a bit of work or 3rd party libraries to ease the protocol implementation.

tamhanna, xsacha, please go to private or to another thread about app ads. As tamhanna said it is really offtopic here.

Yes, in fact they hide when performance is sub-optimal.

I read this thread a long time ago (before I was registered on here) and implemented it using Qt4.7.
There's a workaround, involving adding a timer (first reply shows how to do it).

It works quite well as a notification for loading files/images and such. I really wish more developers used it -- especially on Windows/Symbian where you get annoyed by boxes all the time.

xsacha: I do not get your point(s).

The best is to have open books as made available in symbian.org wiki. Any updates any one can update it.

I agree something like this might be nice. However, it seems like an opportunity for a third-party commercial or community project, rather than a Nokia Qt project. I'd hate to see Qt development resources go toward it. It should be possible to build something like LightSwitch on top of Qt without core changes, and there are many other advancements for the Trolls to work on, which would help the larger Qt community.

I agree with Tobias above: this seems to be the territory for third party widget providers.

I had a closer look at the Cola wiki. It uses the Eclipse Communication Framework (ECF), which seems quit big. Didn't find anything similar in Qt Creator. Seems to be a bigger job than I first thought.

nice answers :), understood and thanks for help.

Denis: Currently there are no plans for that. In fact you are the first to mention a preference for Ctrl-5 that I am aware of.

Thank you very much.
I try it the way you suggest me and worked perfectly :)

Thanks MariusG, it is very helpful to me......

pushpendrak: Check the "shop":http://shop.qt.nokia.com/en/product-licenses.html for pricing information. The trolls here tend to be developers and most are not really aware of the current pricing schemes (at least I am not:-). Depending on what you want to do you may even be able to use the open source license, so you might want to check that first.

Since I am not aware of any Qt 5 related planning can not tell you whether it makes sense to wait for it or not.