The Lounge

Let's put it this way: if there is a limit, I haven't hit it, so you're good for quite a while.

[image: MainScreenEd.png?dl=0]

Sorry, I just want to try the formatting Bold Italic List: list item 1 list item 2 No..no..no www.example.com int main( int argc, char * argv[] ) { cout << "Hello world" << endl; } Normal text [image: cabe85a8-0557-4e6f-af51-2080239e9094_560_420.jpg]

@Afsha If you have a real Qt question, you can post it e.g. "General and Desktop". If you want to spam do it somewhere else or better get a decent hobby.

AFAIK the automotive offering comes with Boot2Qt which will automatically bake a Linux distro with Qt and deploy it to target board. When doing embedded development, people tend to compile everything themselves anyway. Actually having to follow a guide on how to cross-compile Qt for Raspberry Pi is a good exercise to train for more "hardcore" embedded development. I'm not saying I'm against something prebuilt for Raspbian, but I don't think it's a high priority target,. And, as Sam already pointed out - Qt team already has to go through considerable effort to prepare current package roster.

@mzimmers said in Showdown! Qt vs. LabVIEW: difficult to quantify, but nonetheless important: Qt gets it. +1 Back when I was trying out GTK and Qt, I felt the difference immediately. With Qt Creator, we can definitely tell that Qt engineers eat their own dogfood!

Thanks for the reply and suggestion.

@J.Hilk That is very pretty! But, no, it was not just a question of writing QED. I refer you to the quote I pasted above, where you can see that another person has the same recollection as I have about some very specific wording we were made to use, which we have now forgotten. It was something about what we had to write for the move to generalise from 1/k/k + 1 to n. And something similar in the way of "special wording" when we talked about the confidence-relationship between x-bar & mu in statistics....

I've been using the Qt IDE for several years, and have watched the goings on in Qt-land. I'd agree that US adoption of the Qt framework seems to lag that in other tech-savvy nations. This could be due to Microsoft's stranglehold on the US Fortune 500, or the relative lack of interest in the write-once, build-anywhere paradigm that is Qt's main selling point. In any event, I imagine it's going to be awhile before Qt becomes a household word in the US. Sure hope I'm wrong...

HI and welcome to devnet, Do you have any presentation about your project ?

www.qtcentre.org/threads/69407-Forum-captcha-broken

@J.Hilk I seem to be a lone voice, so I'll keep it very brief, but I cannot help but comment... I so strongly do not agree that, e.g., "addition" is: defenitly inventions by humans ... Of course the symbols or the numeric system (like base 10/12), or the way we measure/express angles (degrees, radians) are indeed human inventions. But a triangle has 3 angles whose magnitudes add up to the same magnitude as the angle of a straight line whether we care to express it, or even notice it, or not. The Sun has a volume which depends only on its radius whether humans sit on Earth and contemplate it or whether humans never evolved. When you start with one apple, and a another apple falls from a tree, there are more apples then there were to start with, even if the only life on Earth turns out to be fruits. In short, there is no invention here, only discovery... I guess I'll have to plough my lonely furrow in my understanding/beliefs compared to you Qt guys... :)

@JKSH said in I have >5 years of active experience in both Qt and LabVIEW. AMA. (featuring a lengthy prologue): Fascinating. Do you find the LabVIEW code any easier to read if you are already familiar with the "core"/"trunk" of the code?: To be honest, it took me embarrassingly long to realize, that the 2 pictures posted have the same code in it, one just has a loop wraped around it. But once that was clear, it was indeed easier to read. 😊

@aha_1980 s/additional/optional/ ;) Joking aside, the minimal Kit is indeed Qt + compatible compiler. Everything else is optional even though better to have at hand :)

@JonB what @aha_1980 said. Just for clarity, no, they don't. :)

Excellent!! Thanks @tekojo :)

Yeah after sitting in the GUI part all day and come back to the embedded ARM. std::string is just such a B! compared to QString. ;)

@kshegunov thanks for sharing, minutes Physics always worth a thumps up :-) But to be honest, I'm more excited about the moving dart-board mentioned in the video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MHTizZ_XcUM&feature=youtu.be