Seemingly random behaviour in states and property changes
-
I've re-read the example just to be sure I didn't miss something but in fact I did. If you want to modify the AI you "only" need to modify the computerTurn method or add a new xxxAI method and call it from computerTurn.
There's no need to modify any other file.
-
@SGaist I don't think I understand... What computerTurn method? I don't have one in my code, at least by that name. Everything is in the onClicked, so that it'll react to the click, perform the necessary changes according to the user action, and then do the computer's move... Which is done in the same way as the human's move, so theoretically it should work.
But it's late and I'm tired, so maybe you said something very obvious and I just don't see it.
-
In the Tic-Tac-Toe example you linked in your first post, you have the AI implementation in tic-tac-toe.js which contains computerTurn that will call either smartAI or randomAI based on your settings. So if you want to add a new AI, you could implement it in a myMegaCoolAI method that you will call from computerTurn (again based on the settings of the application)
-
@SGaist But as I said I don't have a computerTurn method. If you look at my code instead of the example, you'll see I have several move methods (a random move, a slightly smarter move, and a minimax-based move) in my js file, and I call them from the onClicked after the player completes their move, thereby simulating the computer's turn. That should suffice, right? I'm just getting rid of a level of indirection.
-
Removing that "level of indirection" makes the code globally less clear. If you take the original, replacing the AI with your own is really just modifying the computerTurn part, you would even have to care about the UI part since it's already handled properly.
-
@SGaist "Less clear" is subjective, but either way it shouldn't be the cause of the strange behaviour I'm seeing.
As for taking the original and merely replacing the original... Well, that kind of defeats the purpose of learning Qt, which is why I'm implementing the example from scratch. Just changing the AI would at best teach me a bit of Javascript. Granted, that one is my fault because in the first comment of this topic I didn't properly word what I was actually doing.
-
We might then see the learning process a bit differently. I'd first implement the AI the way I want it based on what exist to ensure that part is working. Then on the next iteration, I'd modify another part of the code. That way you know more or less exactly what you broke when something start to misbehave. Changing several things at once will get you in trouble faster.
Since you want to learn QML, did you took a look at the qmlbook.org web site ?
-
Problem solved. The problem was between the chair and the keyboard. If anyone's curious, the part of my code that takes care of the computer's turn was outside the branch where the player's turn takes place, and it should be inside. And the same for the checking of whether it's a win or a draw after both players complete a turn. One of those things that is easy to overlook if one assumes the structure of the code is correct, and the bug is due to misusing a feature of the language/framework/whatever. Well, turns out sometimes the developer can use the tools properly and still be Doing It Wrong™.
-
All programming languages offer features to shoot yourself in the foot ;)
Glad you found out and thanks for sharing :)
Happy coding !
