New Qt for Embedded Linux Series started
-
To complete the previous post, here is the link for ltib on lpc3250:
As yo can see, there is also another alternative, that is ELDK toolchain. I have not yet tested but I do it before a final decision on the platform to use.
-
This are interesting informations. I will/have to take a look to this.
We are using ptxdist, because we are using the support from "Pengutronix":http://www.pengutronix.de/index_de.html for special kernel driver. Our system is an realtime system (plc) with realtime bussystems like ethercat/canopen, realtime jitter<1us. The board is developed by ourselfs, so no standard hardware. I'm working on the visualization system, of course ;) and on the base system.The toolchain is just a ptxdist project, so it's easy to create the toolchains. The configuration will create with a config menu like the kernel config. This tool is good as long as all needed packages are included. If a specific package/application is not awailable you have to create you own package. The ptxdist is based on a rules system.
I'am also have tested the Android platform. At first with compiling the lib by myself and it's working. Today I have tested the necessita/ministro version and this is create work.
As my boss have seen my Qt application running on my HTC Desire connected to our visualization, he got crazy, took the phone and called his boss ;)
-
This is a good news!
Myself is the boss of myself, and in these project I'm responsible of the software platform at all while my friend / project partner done the hardware project based on my idea, based (2nd level) to the ea3250. The starting point is that the board I am working to develop is those of embedded artists, but it is too expansive against a low cost software and hardware integration platform. I have several product projects to develop on the new board as I am ready with the linux + graphic environment.
So, I need to be sure - reasonable sure - that the choice can be a long term choice. I took a look to your Pengutronix development platform and as I read it seems interesting because very open. As this toolchain has the problems you mentioned, ltib has other problems. If you plan to start with tests on this, please tell me, so I can save at least the time I already spent for silly problems. But blocking. As you know, I imagine, all problems on embedded platforms are silly when you discover why the occurs.
Well, the last thing I have not yet done is to test the ltib alternative as discussed in lpclinux.com.
At the actual date (to be precise in this moment) I have finished to flash the last build with Xephyr X11 server and twm as window manager. The board has a 320x240 fb screen with touch. I see the penguin when the platform start but - this is the actual problem - I am searching on how to configure some file that probably is missing because when I launch startx or xterm or twm or Xephyr I obtain always the message that the display :0 can't be opened.
I think that it can be a hardware problem because /dev/fb0 is present in the device list.I am thinking to something collaborative with you if you are interested, later I write about, let me the time to think exactly on how this can be structured. If you like, obviously :)
-
bq. If you plan to start with tests on this, please tell me, so I can save at least the time I already spent for silly problems. But blocking. As you know, I imagine, all problems on embedded platforms are silly when you discover why the occurs.
That sounds good. Next week I'm on holiday but when I'm back I will start to try.
-
bq. I took a look to your Pengutronix development platform and as I read it seems interesting because very open.
Yes that was important for us. In our first linux device we had used the timesys from timetorm. This tool is based on eclipse and very expensiv. And worst was that after the license is expired you can not use the tool anymore. You can not do anything in the old project :-(
-
I have no X command. Probably I was not clear, because this is the first time I use on an embedded platform a screen display. I compiled the kernel & UImage with the Fb display driver. This is surely correct because I checked with the hardware developer. Then I setup the configuration with X11 that is a tiny x server and twm as window viewer. Thus, what I have in the filesystem as commands startx that is the script the launch Kfbdev (the x-server if I have understood) trying with screen :0 (defined in DISPLAY as an environment variable)
Then the next command is twm -display:0I always obtain the same message : unable to open display ":0"
Following my investigations, the thing that I don't know is where I can search for the configuration file similar to the definitions I find with the common X11 environment in non-embedded linux.
This is my need only to have a complete check of the platform (hardware + software) and next step is to start with Qt
-
As long as I have used and seen x11, there was always an x-server, x-client and an window manager like twm. Kfbdev I don't know. Maybe I have to take a look at this. But why you don't use the qws? This is what I'm using on our device. Anyway, try to set the "DISPLAY=127.0.0.1:0.0", somtimes "DISPLAY=:0" is not enough.
-
Do you mean TinyX. Have you seen "this":http://www.xfree86.org/current/TinyX.1.html page?
-
Alicemirror: if you have a working framebuffer device then you can skip X entirely by using Qt Embedded as this draws directly to the framebuffer and provides its own window manager (QWS).
Check that your user has sufficient permissions to open the /dev/fb0 device too.
-
@Scylla: Yes I have seen TynyX. The X server I use is part of his family, not exactly this but the principle is the same.
Thus I tried too your suggestion exporting DISPLAY including the IP address. Before I have already tried before the lan ip address of the board and the result is the same. What I think is that maybe a stupid think I don't know or forget, because these settings in ltib are almost standard. You suggest another windows manager; I am using twm just because this is the window manage recognized by ltib for this kind of platform. To be honest, I have no idea at this moment what can be the missing component or file that create this strange behavior. I am trying to investigate on configuration file missing (is it possible?)@ZapB: As I wrote above, I agree totally with you: my final target is what you suggest. This X test is only a parallel check. Initially I thought that the simple way was to check the "official" ltib LPC3250 X server mode then create the version with Qt embedded. At the actual date, seeing the problem I am experiencing, including the very small support (near to zero) probably the best choice is to abandon the X version focusing my attention (thanks to the your support and of the other forum members) to Qt embedded saving time and obtaining best results. Do you agree ?
P.S. I am working with the board connecting via ssh as root (tried also as user + sudo too). As embedded platform I don't set special users permission list but simply for now I am using an ssh access (with password) and the root user is doing all the job.
-
It's certainly worth giving Qt for Embedded Linux a try. Just build it and copy across the libs and some examples to see if it works for you.
I'll try to write some of the other articles in the Qt Embedded series in the next few days but I may be offline for sometime this week.
-
ZapB, it's not only worh, it's my definitive choice. And as project reference, I'm the only that decide what to do. So, the actual balance tell me that this is the right choice. I hope to have some good news next week when you are online again :)
Thank you very much for the hints, I appreciate a lot.
-
Hi :) Sorry for the delay in my answer. Today is a hard day of setup and computer organization...
WELL ! Convincted!
I proceed with Qt4embedded. News later.
-
I am sure. But the real good choice I think is to abandon X server ... Now I should download Qt for embedded then check if it is best to develop under that (new for me) toolchain that you are always using - Scylla - or ltib.
@Scilla: if you have some time for me I'll like to discuss advantages and problems to choice your toolchain or ltib (or OpenWrt). Next days I can write some specific pages on these on the wiki as a compendium to what is writing ZapB
