Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Search
  • Get Qt Extensions
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Behind the Scenes
  3. Wiki Discussion
  4. Qt Development vs. Development using Qt
Forum Updated to NodeBB v4.3 + New Features

Qt Development vs. Development using Qt

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Wiki Discussion
14 Posts 7 Posters 6.7k Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • I Offline
    I Offline
    ivan
    wrote on last edited by
    #5

    Well, while wrong, Qt Development is a phrase people are used to.

    When you see a job opportunity which says "Java developer needed" you think of a developer that can program in Java, and not somebody who hacks on Java itself.

    So, IMO, the same goes for Qt.

    Ivan Čukić | ivan.cukic(at)kde.org | KDE e.V.
    Qt Ambassador (from the old Nokia days)

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • D Offline
      D Offline
      david.boddie
      wrote on last edited by
      #6

      So, should I create a new category for "Development of Qt", then? Maybe called DevelopmentOfQtItself, just to make it clear?

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • G Offline
        G Offline
        goetz
        wrote on last edited by
        #7

        "Hacking Qt" would be a good title, IMHO.

        http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • I Offline
          I Offline
          ivan
          wrote on last edited by
          #8

          @Volker +1

          Ivan Čukić | ivan.cukic(at)kde.org | KDE e.V.
          Qt Ambassador (from the old Nokia days)

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • D Offline
            D Offline
            david.boddie
            wrote on last edited by
            #9

            @Volker, @Ivan: I'm not so sure. There are lots of clueless people out there who think that "Hacking Qt" == "Cracking Qt".

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • G Offline
              G Offline
              goetz
              wrote on last edited by
              #10

              [quote author="david.boddie" date="1295273238"]@Volker, @Ivan: I'm not so sure. There are lots of clueless people out there who think that "Hacking Qt" == "Cracking Qt".[/quote]

              If these people really believe this is a serious topic on an official Nokia Qt Developer Network site the well deserve being called idiots.

              http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • I Offline
                I Offline
                ivan
                wrote on last edited by
                #11

                Well, maybe I'm just hanging in the wrong (right? :) ) crowd so everybody knows what 'hacking' means.

                I guess this could be a potential problem for complete newbies (trying not to use volker's word for them:) ) which as Qt becomes more mainstream could prove problematic.

                So, if this is the concern, I guess Nokia/Qt marketing team should come up with a better name which would satisfy both us and the unacquainted ones.

                Ivan Čukić | ivan.cukic(at)kde.org | KDE e.V.
                Qt Ambassador (from the old Nokia days)

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • D Offline
                  D Offline
                  david.boddie
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #12

                  How about HackingOnQt?

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • A Offline
                    A Offline
                    andre
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #13

                    I think there was consensus to move away from camelCase titles and just use spaces. Much easier to read.

                    On the suggestions front, how about "Developing Qt itself" as opposed to "Developing with Qt"?

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • T Offline
                      T Offline
                      troubalex
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #14

                      It's a bit of a tricky question. So far, the biggest chunk of content is about developing applications with Qt as opposed to developing Qt itself.

                      "Qt Development" felt pretty clear to me (similar to "Web Development" for example). I am not sure if we don't confuse more people by naming the category like this which is dealing with the development of the libraries themselves...

                      In conclusion: I don't know either. At least not right now. If you can give me some time, chances are good that it changes. :P

                      THE CAKE IS A LIE
                      Web Community Manager - Qt Development Frameworks

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0

                      • Login

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • Users
                      • Groups
                      • Search
                      • Get Qt Extensions
                      • Unsolved