Qt Development vs. Development using Qt
-
-
So, should I create a new category for "Development of Qt", then? Maybe called DevelopmentOfQtItself, just to make it clear?
-
[quote author="david.boddie" date="1295273238"]@Volker, @Ivan: I'm not so sure. There are lots of clueless people out there who think that "Hacking Qt" == "Cracking Qt".[/quote]
If these people really believe this is a serious topic on an official Nokia Qt Developer Network site the well deserve being called idiots.
-
Well, maybe I'm just hanging in the wrong (right? :) ) crowd so everybody knows what 'hacking' means.
I guess this could be a potential problem for complete newbies (trying not to use volker's word for them:) ) which as Qt becomes more mainstream could prove problematic.
So, if this is the concern, I guess Nokia/Qt marketing team should come up with a better name which would satisfy both us and the unacquainted ones.
-
How about HackingOnQt?
-
It's a bit of a tricky question. So far, the biggest chunk of content is about developing applications with Qt as opposed to developing Qt itself.
"Qt Development" felt pretty clear to me (similar to "Web Development" for example). I am not sure if we don't confuse more people by naming the category like this which is dealing with the development of the libraries themselves...
In conclusion: I don't know either. At least not right now. If you can give me some time, chances are good that it changes. :P