Launch telnet from Qt GUI application

[richferrara]

I figured it out.

system("start telnet") works.

[JonB]

@richferrara said in Launch telnet from Qt GUI application:

system("start telnet") works.

As should the code I suggested sticking with QProcess.

[Christian Ehrlicher]

Why one needs to run a cmd.exe at all?

Simply follow the docs

QObject *parent = new QObject;
...
QString program = "telnet";
QStringList arguments;
arguments << "172.99.99.99";

QProcess *myProcess = new QProcess(parent);
myProcess->start(program, arguments);

[JonB]

@Christian-Ehrlicher
The OP essentially claimed to have tried this and claimed it did not work:

The first thing I tried was just launching telnet directly:
QStringList args = {"172.99.99.99"}; // using my target IP address
QProcess::startDetached("telnet.exe", {args});

That is why I tried "building up" step by step with them to see what was happening. Have you tried this under Windows (which I cannot do)? The question is whether the Windows' telnet opens any kind of "terminal/console/command" window for itself, the suggestion is it does not and hence is "invisible"?

[richferrara]

The windows telnet command normally runs in its own terminal window. For whatever reason, QProcess seems to only be capable of running applications in the background.

[JonB]

@richferrara
QProcess should be fine. You could also try having it run, say, notepad, if you don't think it can run e.g. a UI process. Did you actually try either my code or @Christian-Ehrlicher's ? If the Windows telnet opens its own window then you ought not need to run it via cmd/start? I guess I will be quiet now as I cannot test under Windows, maybe @Christian-Ehrlicher will.

[Christian Ehrlicher]

@richferrara said in Launch telnet from Qt GUI application:

For whatever reason, QProcess seems to only be capable of running applications in the background.

This is wrong. Please show your code and don't use QProcess::startDetached() if you want to interact with your application.

[JonB]

@Christian-Ehrlicher said in Launch telnet from Qt GUI application:

and don't use QProcess::startDetached() if you want to interact with your application

Oh, really??

[Christian Ehrlicher]

@JonB said in Launch telnet from Qt GUI application:

@Christian-Ehrlicher said in Launch telnet from Qt GUI application:

and don't use QProcess::startDetached() if you want to interact with your application

Oh, really??

That's the whole point of this function - fire and forget
https://doc.qt.io/qt-6/qprocess.html#startDetached

[JonB]

@Christian-Ehrlicher said in Launch telnet from Qt GUI application:

and don't use QProcess::startDetached() if you want to interact with your application

and

That's the whole point of this function - fire and forget
https://doc.qt.io/qt-6/qprocess.html#startDetached

Hi Christian. I am sorry but I do not agree with your statements. Under Linux at least startDetached() causes the child process not to get killed when the parent process exits, but it is not true to say that means you do not use if you need interaction.

Testing under Linux at least, where telnet does not open its own window (maybe it does under Windows, I don't know) while, say, gedit does, I see the following behaviour:

• start("telnet"): runs telnet (in the background), no window, exiting Qt app kills the telnet.
• startDetached("telnet"): same as start(), but exiting Qt app does not kill the telnet.
• start("gedit"): runs gedit, that creates its own window and interacts fine, exiting Qt app kills the gedit.
• startDetached("gedit"): same as start(), but exiting Qt app does not kill the gedit.

If I want a Linux spawned telnet to be visible and have a window I have to use something like e.g. xterm -e telnet as the command. And again that behaves as above: dies on parent exit with start(), continues to run afterwards with startDetached(), but same interaction in both cases.

Maybe it's different under Windows and/or with telnet there, but saying that "and don't use QProcess::startDetached() if you want to interact with your application" is not the story under Linux at least. Which is why I expressed my surprise when you wrote that, as not my experience in Linux.