Unexpected output qt c++ function
-
A bit hard to guess since your code is pretty nested. You should definitively review your function as two issues stand out:
- you define
pre_indexas static. Why? It will only be initialized on the first function call. Its value upon return will be used for all other calls. Does not seem like what you want and may trigger unexpected behavior. Also: Why do you use static in your first for loop? - your function will trigger an exception if you call it with the string “<“.
Why don’t you set a break point inside
on_pushButton_4_clicked()and debug your way through your function? - you define
-
Folow-up from here: https://forum.qt.io/topic/132702/unresolved-external-symbol-class-std-basic-_string/
As said before - learn to use a debugger. -
A bit hard to guess since your code is pretty nested. You should definitively review your function as two issues stand out:
- you define
pre_indexas static. Why? It will only be initialized on the first function call. Its value upon return will be used for all other calls. Does not seem like what you want and may trigger unexpected behavior. Also: Why do you use static in your first for loop? - your function will trigger an exception if you call it with the string “<“.
Why don’t you set a break point inside
on_pushButton_4_clicked()and debug your way through your function?@AxelVienna i was not static but i got a warning from qt ro make it static so i just tried doing that , but it does'nt work either ways, thanks for helping
- you define
-
@AxelVienna i was not static but i got a warning from qt ro make it static so i just tried doing that , but it does'nt work either ways, thanks for helping
@Zeyad-Khaled
Apart from what others have said about debug your code and/or putqDebug()statements into it if you want to know how it is behaving.What does your code actually do, and why in the world do you do it the way you do it? The code is opaque. Writing chunks of code to output bits like
</,>and doing pops and checks and so on seems complex and error-prone. Why don't you use something like QDomDocument, or at least some node-structural-hierarchy of your own, to generate output from, instead of outputting piecemeal? -
@Zeyad-Khaled
Apart from what others have said about debug your code and/or putqDebug()statements into it if you want to know how it is behaving.What does your code actually do, and why in the world do you do it the way you do it? The code is opaque. Writing chunks of code to output bits like
</,>and doing pops and checks and so on seems complex and error-prone. Why don't you use something like QDomDocument, or at least some node-structural-hierarchy of your own, to generate output from, instead of outputting piecemeal?@JonB it's A College Project and we are Required to write Code Using native c++ and i didn't write those functions my teammembers wrote it , so iam just trying to collect everything together and to check errors to make it just work , thank for helpinng
-
@JonB it's A College Project and we are Required to write Code Using native c++ and i didn't write those functions my teammembers wrote it , so iam just trying to collect everything together and to check errors to make it just work , thank for helpinng
@Zeyad-Khaled
Well it sure is an opaque piece of code they have written, goodness knows why it works in one environment but not another.I don't know what
the function works well on Visual studio and the output is the desired one ,But when i try to embed it in my app it works but the output is not what i exactly was looking for
means. vscode is just an IDE for writing/running code. Code does not behave one way when run within vscode and another way outside of it. One does not get "different output" under vscode compared to (what you call) "Qt Output". When you say that, what do you mean, do you mean you use a different compiler in Qt Creator versus in vscode?
What does it actually do anyway? It seems to take some (potentially) malformed XML input and then make some of its own "guesses" about how to "correct" the input to produce some (well-formed?) XML output from it, is that it? I have no idea how it works/is supposed to work, as there is no one way to "guess"/"correct" any ill-formed XML input, there are a non-ending number of ways one might choose for what the malformed input might intend and so what to do to change it.
-
@Zeyad-Khaled
Well it sure is an opaque piece of code they have written, goodness knows why it works in one environment but not another.I don't know what
the function works well on Visual studio and the output is the desired one ,But when i try to embed it in my app it works but the output is not what i exactly was looking for
means. vscode is just an IDE for writing/running code. Code does not behave one way when run within vscode and another way outside of it. One does not get "different output" under vscode compared to (what you call) "Qt Output". When you say that, what do you mean, do you mean you use a different compiler in Qt Creator versus in vscode?
What does it actually do anyway? It seems to take some (potentially) malformed XML input and then make some of its own "guesses" about how to "correct" the input to produce some (well-formed?) XML output from it, is that it? I have no idea how it works/is supposed to work, as there is no one way to "guess"/"correct" any ill-formed XML input, there are a non-ending number of ways one might choose for what the malformed input might intend and so what to do to change it.
@JonB i agree with in that point , i tried putting the input in a different way that he expects and it ofcourse pops an error and the program terminates , the code should take xml file nad preetify it but it doesn't work in alot of cases except the only case he has assumed , Shall i get a help about the structure to use or a way to write this in a good Structure
-
You may want to test your code in Qt Creator with the same code as in vscode, i.e. with a hard coded string variable? Make the same call twice with the same input string, to rule out misbehavior due to the static variable. BTW, show us your compiler warnings that you eliminate by making i static in your for loop.
-
That static loop variable made me raise an eyebrow too. at function scope it would set the initial value on the first iteration and then all future reference would be based on whatever the last value it it was. OP doesn't state whether the function in which it is called is used once or called multiple times....but yeah, a static loop control var doesn't really make sense unless it servers as a global accumulator, in which case for() isn't really appropriate.
-
Making the
forcounterstaticwill definitely make the behaviour go wrong if the function is called more than once. If it is the case that there are "compiler warnings that you eliminate by making i static in your for loop" I too would like to see the original warnings.Separately there are incorrect assumptions about what you can afford to do to
iin the loop. For example, in a loop which limits it toi < xml_edit.length()one cannot afford to go:i++; if (xml_edit[i] != '/')and other similar cases.
