Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Search
  • Get Qt Extensions
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Special Interest Groups
  3. Qt Contribution
  4. How to correctly add suggestions for the docs, that actually get reviewed?
Forum Updated to NodeBB v4.3 + New Features

How to correctly add suggestions for the docs, that actually get reviewed?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Solved Qt Contribution
4 Posts 3 Posters 1.6k Views 3 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    devjb
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Hi,

    three months ago, I filed a suggestion against Qt's documentation:

    https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-75502

    The assignee of that documentation suggestion has automatically been set to "Qt documentation team". However, that account has not been active in the bugtracker for the last 7/8 Years.

    It seems, that no one actually reviews and categorizes the suggestion according to the workflow:

    https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-75502?workflowName=Qt+Bug+Tracking+v2.3&stepId=2

    Can I do anything else, to get the suggestion at least initially reviewed?

    Did I tag it wrong?

    Thanks

    Jochen

    aha_1980A 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • D devjb

      Hi,

      three months ago, I filed a suggestion against Qt's documentation:

      https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-75502

      The assignee of that documentation suggestion has automatically been set to "Qt documentation team". However, that account has not been active in the bugtracker for the last 7/8 Years.

      It seems, that no one actually reviews and categorizes the suggestion according to the workflow:

      https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-75502?workflowName=Qt+Bug+Tracking+v2.3&stepId=2

      Can I do anything else, to get the suggestion at least initially reviewed?

      Did I tag it wrong?

      Thanks

      Jochen

      aha_1980A Offline
      aha_1980A Offline
      aha_1980
      Lifetime Qt Champion
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      @devjb Everything is in flow now, Paul already added a patch for code review. I have some small objections, but in general your suggestion is fine and will be integrated soonish.

      And no, I don't think you did anything wrong, it's just the amount of bug reports that makes it hard to follow them all.

      For your small suggestion you may have been faster by submitting a patch to Gerrit directly.

      Regards

      Qt has to stay free or it will die.

      1 Reply Last reply
      4
      • D Offline
        D Offline
        devjb
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        Thank you for that quick and satisfying answer!

        1 Reply Last reply
        1
        • SGaistS Offline
          SGaistS Offline
          SGaist
          Lifetime Qt Champion
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          Hi,

          One more thing to add, the account set as responsible is a team account so it means it has several members like Paul. The fact it is shown as not active is just related to the fact that it's not a physical person.

          There are several others like that :-)

          Interested in AI ? www.idiap.ch
          Please read the Qt Code of Conduct - https://forum.qt.io/topic/113070/qt-code-of-conduct

          1 Reply Last reply
          3

          • Login

          • Login or register to search.
          • First post
            Last post
          0
          • Categories
          • Recent
          • Tags
          • Popular
          • Users
          • Groups
          • Search
          • Get Qt Extensions
          • Unsolved