what are the reasons for these missing bindings? Is it because there is no need for binding, or is it that they cannot be implemented?

markleo

When reading the official documentation, I saw:
Qt for Python Missing Bindings
https://wiki.qt.io/Qt_for_Python_Missing_Bindings

So, what are the reasons for these missing bindings?
Is it because there is no need for binding, or is it that they cannot be implemented?

JonB

@markleo
You ask a lot of generic questions! The answer is that certain interfaces simply have not been implemented, rather than there is no "need" for them or they "cannot" be implemented.

JonB

@markleo

Number of types in QtDataVisualization: 35

Number of missing types: 0

I read this as telling that there are no missing/types bindings for QtDataVisualization, it should work as-is.

markleo

@JonB Hi, thanks your reply, I mean why Python binding do not cover all the C++ Qt modules?

JonB

@markleo
You ask a lot of generic questions! The answer is that certain interfaces simply have not been implemented, rather than there is no "need" for them or they "cannot" be implemented.

markleo

thanks for your answer, I also have a question, because Qt has been developing for many years, why are there still C++ modules that have not implemented bindding?

SGaist

That's a question for the Qt Company and/or the module maintainers. This is a user forum.
Note that writing bindings is a non trivial task depending on the underlying types and their lifetime management constraints.