Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Search
  • Get Qt Extensions
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Qt Development
  3. Mobile and Embedded
  4. Unable to debug Android App (Windows + Qt Creator 12 + LLDB)
Forum Updated to NodeBB v4.3 + New Features

Unable to debug Android App (Windows + Qt Creator 12 + LLDB)

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Unsolved Mobile and Embedded
169 Posts 9 Posters 71.3k Views 2 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • C CodesInChaoss

    so since Android SDK with API 31 EMPLOYS Java class version 61 objects for its components this IMPLIES a requirements for JDK version 17. ​

    QT ... kindly update your docs?

    C Offline
    C Offline
    CodesInChaoss
    wrote on last edited by
    #86

    7a25f61d-68ea-45ed-8b56-f538613a675a-image.png @CodesInChaoss

    that's WRONG... Android API 31 components (SDK) REQUIRES (seemingly JAVA SE version 17) since its components use object version 61 NOT 55.

    C 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • C CodesInChaoss

      7a25f61d-68ea-45ed-8b56-f538613a675a-image.png @CodesInChaoss

      that's WRONG... Android API 31 components (SDK) REQUIRES (seemingly JAVA SE version 17) since its components use object version 61 NOT 55.

      C Offline
      C Offline
      CodesInChaoss
      wrote on last edited by
      #87

      let's keep trying... shall we...

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • JoeCFDJ JoeCFD

        @CodesInChaoss Maybe try to do it on Linux and it could be easier. The executable is same.

        C Offline
        C Offline
        CodesInChaoss
        wrote on last edited by
        #88

        @JoeCFD you say?

        C 2 Replies Last reply
        0
        • C CodesInChaoss

          @JoeCFD you say?

          C Offline
          C Offline
          CodesInChaoss
          wrote on last edited by
          #89

          @CodesInChaoss e1ac9316-6879-4b64-a8b7-ff8f85a8e723-image.png

          but windows is on the list..but sure.. if it's to help out... we are are up for ANYTHING

          C 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • C CodesInChaoss

            @CodesInChaoss e1ac9316-6879-4b64-a8b7-ff8f85a8e723-image.png

            but windows is on the list..but sure.. if it's to help out... we are are up for ANYTHING

            C Offline
            C Offline
            CodesInChaoss
            wrote on last edited by
            #90

            @CodesInChaoss b57a4701-8801-489c-9f38-0e19f45cf823-image.png Fetching Ubuntu 20.04 LTS already

            C 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • C CodesInChaoss

              @CodesInChaoss b57a4701-8801-489c-9f38-0e19f45cf823-image.png Fetching Ubuntu 20.04 LTS already

              C Offline
              C Offline
              CodesInChaoss
              wrote on last edited by
              #91
              This post is deleted!
              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • C CodesInChaoss

                @JoeCFD you say?

                C Offline
                C Offline
                CodesInChaoss
                wrote on last edited by CodesInChaoss
                #92

                @CodesInChaoss f95a2129-b57c-4acd-bb74-11707ecc3050-image.png

                The exact version of UBUNTU as advised by QT documentation....

                Now,' hilarious' is not a word which would do justice, or is it..

                C JoeCFDJ 2 Replies Last reply
                0
                • C CodesInChaoss

                  @CodesInChaoss f95a2129-b57c-4acd-bb74-11707ecc3050-image.png

                  The exact version of UBUNTU as advised by QT documentation....

                  Now,' hilarious' is not a word which would do justice, or is it..

                  C Offline
                  C Offline
                  CodesInChaoss
                  wrote on last edited by CodesInChaoss
                  #93

                  The above is shown... On a fresh Ubuntu installation... on default 5.15.16 settings...... online installer...

                  after the installation is finished and when attempting to launch Creator 12

                  JoeCFDJ 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • C CodesInChaoss

                    The above is shown... On a fresh Ubuntu installation... on default 5.15.16 settings...... online installer...

                    after the installation is finished and when attempting to launch Creator 12

                    JoeCFDJ Offline
                    JoeCFDJ Offline
                    JoeCFD
                    wrote on last edited by JoeCFD
                    #94

                    @CodesInChaoss Install Qt 5.15.2 and use Qt Creator which comes with Qt 5.15.2 on Ubuntu 22.04 That is what I did with my project for Android. No issues with debugging. I will have a shot at Qt 6.6.2 with Qt Creator 12 for Android on Monday. I know it is messy and too many settings.

                    C 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • JoeCFDJ JoeCFD

                      @CodesInChaoss Install Qt 5.15.2 and use Qt Creator which comes with Qt 5.15.2 on Ubuntu 22.04 That is what I did with my project for Android. No issues with debugging. I will have a shot at Qt 6.6.2 with Qt Creator 12 for Android on Monday. I know it is messy and too many settings.

                      C Offline
                      C Offline
                      CodesInChaoss
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #95

                      @JoeCFD

                      Thank you kindly for your reply, so few people here willing to give a helpful hand.

                      597882e5-acd5-4ef8-93bf-0212122f355f-image.png

                      Yet, since we decided to pay for QT to in order to avoid the inherent bogs of open source (which we've been using years) we rather stick to QT creator which is compatible with QT 5.15.16 (and the prior version which you suggested is not).

                      Follow instructions above.

                      Would be nice for Qt team to improve installer as they state no additional libraries would be needed on this very Ubuntu.

                      Follow steps above to install missing libs.

                      C 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • C CodesInChaoss

                        @JoeCFD

                        Thank you kindly for your reply, so few people here willing to give a helpful hand.

                        597882e5-acd5-4ef8-93bf-0212122f355f-image.png

                        Yet, since we decided to pay for QT to in order to avoid the inherent bogs of open source (which we've been using years) we rather stick to QT creator which is compatible with QT 5.15.16 (and the prior version which you suggested is not).

                        Follow instructions above.

                        Would be nice for Qt team to improve installer as they state no additional libraries would be needed on this very Ubuntu.

                        Follow steps above to install missing libs.

                        C Offline
                        C Offline
                        CodesInChaoss
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #96

                        565fc1e1-aba4-4810-a439-a8618b046381-image.png @CodesInChaoss

                        another incompatibility

                        Ubuntu comes with TSL 3.0 not 1.1.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • C CodesInChaoss

                          @CodesInChaoss f95a2129-b57c-4acd-bb74-11707ecc3050-image.png

                          The exact version of UBUNTU as advised by QT documentation....

                          Now,' hilarious' is not a word which would do justice, or is it..

                          JoeCFDJ Offline
                          JoeCFDJ Offline
                          JoeCFD
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #97

                          @CodesInChaoss Ubuntu 22.04 may be better. Ubuntu 20.04 is kind of old. At home I installed 23.04.

                          C 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • JoeCFDJ JoeCFD

                            @CodesInChaoss Ubuntu 22.04 may be better. Ubuntu 20.04 is kind of old. At home I installed 23.04.

                            C Offline
                            C Offline
                            CodesInChaoss
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #98

                            @JoeCFD

                            well we know very well BUT that's what QT recommends for 5.15.16, and we want simply to be able to debug above anything else.

                            C 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • C CodesInChaoss

                              @JoeCFD

                              well we know very well BUT that's what QT recommends for 5.15.16, and we want simply to be able to debug above anything else.

                              C Offline
                              C Offline
                              CodesInChaoss
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #99

                              We've now compiled OpenSSL 1.1.1 from sources , installed fired up QT Creator 12, the Android SDK autonomous installation process now commenced fine.. let us hope for the best.

                              Fingers crossed.

                              C 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • C CodesInChaoss

                                We've now compiled OpenSSL 1.1.1 from sources , installed fired up QT Creator 12, the Android SDK autonomous installation process now commenced fine.. let us hope for the best.

                                Fingers crossed.

                                C Offline
                                C Offline
                                CodesInChaoss
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #100

                                @CodesInChaoss cd722ece-94b5-409d-b49e-3f0ba3d782c3-image.png

                                C 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • C CodesInChaoss

                                  @CodesInChaoss cd722ece-94b5-409d-b49e-3f0ba3d782c3-image.png

                                  C Offline
                                  C Offline
                                  CodesInChaoss
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #101

                                  @CodesInChaoss 8cf99d2d-c287-4ad8-8ca2-818055b24355-image.png

                                  C 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • C CodesInChaoss

                                    @CodesInChaoss 8cf99d2d-c287-4ad8-8ca2-818055b24355-image.png

                                    C Offline
                                    C Offline
                                    CodesInChaoss
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #102

                                    @CodesInChaoss d7ef85e8-d162-474c-95d8-fc6da65fcf44-image.png

                                    so we've downloaded by hand; looking good;

                                    but

                                    The Kits... not so much...
                                    3f70272c-aed7-46e1-af26-9a4813c047cd-image.png

                                    C 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • C CodesInChaoss

                                      @CodesInChaoss d7ef85e8-d162-474c-95d8-fc6da65fcf44-image.png

                                      so we've downloaded by hand; looking good;

                                      but

                                      The Kits... not so much...
                                      3f70272c-aed7-46e1-af26-9a4813c047cd-image.png

                                      C Offline
                                      C Offline
                                      CodesInChaoss
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #103

                                      Restarting QT Creator help for the kits to properly initialize:
                                      50209866-7ff2-4f1c-88df-c0c6562a150b-image.png

                                      now the only warning is that a device is missing.. well because it's missing as of now

                                      C 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • C CodesInChaoss

                                        Restarting QT Creator help for the kits to properly initialize:
                                        50209866-7ff2-4f1c-88df-c0c6562a150b-image.png

                                        now the only warning is that a device is missing.. well because it's missing as of now

                                        C Offline
                                        C Offline
                                        CodesInChaoss
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #104

                                        @CodesInChaoss

                                        57b864af-f1a1-453b-b66b-b0e7cc14c147-image.png

                                        We've got a single Multi-Abi kit, let's look inside

                                        5ddf384e-6a36-4e6b-a20e-25d032b3268f-image.png

                                        same settings as on Windows.

                                        we would switch compiler to aarch64, which we believe should be by default by now. Few 32 bit devices around.

                                        Now the question.. on Linux... we should be after LLDB correct? not gdb

                                        it's the freedom oriented realm where all the Linux level latest goodies are expected to shine, right?

                                        Let the Microsoft burdens be upon us no more.

                                        Fingers crossed.

                                        let's try to debug.

                                        C 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • C CodesInChaoss

                                          @CodesInChaoss

                                          57b864af-f1a1-453b-b66b-b0e7cc14c147-image.png

                                          We've got a single Multi-Abi kit, let's look inside

                                          5ddf384e-6a36-4e6b-a20e-25d032b3268f-image.png

                                          same settings as on Windows.

                                          we would switch compiler to aarch64, which we believe should be by default by now. Few 32 bit devices around.

                                          Now the question.. on Linux... we should be after LLDB correct? not gdb

                                          it's the freedom oriented realm where all the Linux level latest goodies are expected to shine, right?

                                          Let the Microsoft burdens be upon us no more.

                                          Fingers crossed.

                                          let's try to debug.

                                          C Offline
                                          C Offline
                                          CodesInChaoss
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #105

                                          @CodesInChaoss 7e1b6807-4752-444f-a28b-6a00ff1ff0d9-image.png

                                          eh.. it's been long since I've seen password field neither encrypted nor 'asterixed'...

                                          C 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0

                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups
                                          • Search
                                          • Get Qt Extensions
                                          • Unsolved