Qt 6.6.0 Destructor of QList causes a crash.
-
@JonB
Thank you very much for the answer, I had no idea that was the case.So my by mixing debug and release what is meant is literally don't build your own application in debug with Qt release libs or vice versa.
@human99
Exactly that. I don't quite know how in your situation all the stuff successfully links when some is debug-only and some is release-only, I don't know if that is something MSVC permits, but it doesn't sound good. All of one kind or another, then see if your bug occurs. -
@human99
Exactly that. I don't quite know how in your situation all the stuff successfully links when some is debug-only and some is release-only, I don't know if that is something MSVC permits, but it doesn't sound good. All of one kind or another, then see if your bug occurs.@JonB
Thank you very much for the info. I built the app for release and it works perfectly fine. As you could tell I'm a bit new to system's languages so I never knew about this.May I ask how do you automate this with CMake?
I've compiled QT for x64 Release and installed it in C:\qt6. I imagine if I wanted to build my app for debug I'd need to recompile QT for x64 debug and install it where?
I can install it in some other arbitrary path and figure out how to manually get this working but is there any sensible way to install it such that a CMake flag would automatically build with the appropriate qt version?
-
@JonB
Thank you very much for the info. I built the app for release and it works perfectly fine. As you could tell I'm a bit new to system's languages so I never knew about this.May I ask how do you automate this with CMake?
I've compiled QT for x64 Release and installed it in C:\qt6. I imagine if I wanted to build my app for debug I'd need to recompile QT for x64 debug and install it where?
I can install it in some other arbitrary path and figure out how to manually get this working but is there any sensible way to install it such that a CMake flag would automatically build with the appropriate qt version?
-
@human99
Exactly that. I don't quite know how in your situation all the stuff successfully links when some is debug-only and some is release-only, I don't know if that is something MSVC permits, but it doesn't sound good. All of one kind or another, then see if your bug occurs.@JonB Yeah you're right there's some funky business going on since now that I built the debug version all the .dlls and .libs names end with a d to differenciate them from their release counterparts.
Why my debug build before was linking to release libraries is beyond me. Then again I am calling cmake through visual studio so I can imagine something being caused by that.
-
@JonB
Thank you very much for the info. I built the app for release and it works perfectly fine. As you could tell I'm a bit new to system's languages so I never knew about this.May I ask how do you automate this with CMake?
I've compiled QT for x64 Release and installed it in C:\qt6. I imagine if I wanted to build my app for debug I'd need to recompile QT for x64 debug and install it where?
I can install it in some other arbitrary path and figure out how to manually get this working but is there any sensible way to install it such that a CMake flag would automatically build with the appropriate qt version?
@human99 said in Qt 6.6.0 Destructor of QList causes a crash.:
I'd need to recompile QT for x64 debug and install it where?
In the same place.
-
@human99 said in Qt 6.6.0 Destructor of QList causes a crash.:
I'd need to recompile QT for x64 debug and install it where?
In the same place.
@Christian-Ehrlicher
I'm compiling on windows so do you mean that when I use configure.bat I provide the same folder as an argument to the
-prefix flag. And build twice, once for debug, once for release and install them to the same directory?I've also seen the -debug-and-release option for configure.bat which seems like it was made for this but unfortunately I'm getting an error when using that flag.
-
@Christian-Ehrlicher
I'm compiling on windows so do you mean that when I use configure.bat I provide the same folder as an argument to the
-prefix flag. And build twice, once for debug, once for release and install them to the same directory?I've also seen the -debug-and-release option for configure.bat which seems like it was made for this but unfortunately I'm getting an error when using that flag.
@human99 said in Qt 6.6.0 Destructor of QList causes a crash.:
And build twice, once for debug, once for release and install them to the same directory?
In the same place.
What else should this mean?
-
@human99 said in Qt 6.6.0 Destructor of QList causes a crash.:
And build twice, once for debug, once for release and install them to the same directory?
In the same place.
What else should this mean?
-
H human99 has marked this topic as solved on
-
From the point of view of a beginner that's not familiar with building code it's unintuitive. I assumed the install directory would need to be empty. Thank you very much for the input, both of you solved my problem.
@human99 When you follow https://doc.qt.io/qt-6/windows-building.html then debug and release is built in one step. When you followed it and did only get the release libs then it's a bug on Qt side. Otherwise you did something different without known what to do.
-
@human99 When you follow https://doc.qt.io/qt-6/windows-building.html then debug and release is built in one step. When you followed it and did only get the release libs then it's a bug on Qt side. Otherwise you did something different without known what to do.
@Christian-Ehrlicher Thanks for the extra info. I followed https://wiki.qt.io/Building_Qt_6_from_Git, and looking at the link you provided, it outlines the same steps. The only difference being that the link I followed also shows how to get the sources from the qt git repo.
I don't know if it's a bug on QT's side, I suppose it would be if the build's default behaviour should be to build both debug and release libraries.
To be specific: After I ran configure.bat, the batch script's output to the commandline outlines your build options:
Build options: Mode ................................... release ...And in my case the mode was set to release. And as a sanity check looking in the install folder, the names of all of the .dlls and .lib files do not end with d, so they're definitely the release binary files.
There is a flag you could pass to configure.bat called -debug-and-release that changes this behaviour. Results in a build error for me, but that's another topic. Building twice, once with -release, and once with -debug separately work flawlessly however.
I used configure.bat as shown in the links, I didn't manually change the target output of the build.
-
@Christian-Ehrlicher Thanks for the extra info. I followed https://wiki.qt.io/Building_Qt_6_from_Git, and looking at the link you provided, it outlines the same steps. The only difference being that the link I followed also shows how to get the sources from the qt git repo.
I don't know if it's a bug on QT's side, I suppose it would be if the build's default behaviour should be to build both debug and release libraries.
To be specific: After I ran configure.bat, the batch script's output to the commandline outlines your build options:
Build options: Mode ................................... release ...And in my case the mode was set to release. And as a sanity check looking in the install folder, the names of all of the .dlls and .lib files do not end with d, so they're definitely the release binary files.
There is a flag you could pass to configure.bat called -debug-and-release that changes this behaviour. Results in a build error for me, but that's another topic. Building twice, once with -release, and once with -debug separately work flawlessly however.
I used configure.bat as shown in the links, I didn't manually change the target output of the build.
@human99 Ok, thx for the investigation. I'll take a look on it - it should default to debug-and-release to avoid the problems you've encountered.
