Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Search
  • Get Qt Extensions
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Qt Development
  3. Installation and Deployment
  4. Building QT6 from Source failed (qtbase printsupport_autogen\timestamp)
Forum Updated to NodeBB v4.3 + New Features

Building QT6 from Source failed (qtbase printsupport_autogen\timestamp)

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Unsolved Installation and Deployment
19 Posts 9 Posters 3.2k Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • S SGaist
    14 Apr 2021, 20:01

    I do not say it's related to that but I would rather go with the MinGW version provided by the online installer which should match the one used for the Qt MinGW build.

    B Offline
    B Offline
    BDC_Patrick
    wrote on 14 Apr 2021, 22:11 last edited by
    #7

    @SGaist What do you mean exactly?
    As said, I'm relatively new to building things with cmd/shell..

    J 1 Reply Last reply 15 Apr 2021, 06:39
    0
    • B BDC_Patrick
      14 Apr 2021, 22:11

      @SGaist What do you mean exactly?
      As said, I'm relatively new to building things with cmd/shell..

      J Offline
      J Offline
      jsulm
      Lifetime Qt Champion
      wrote on 15 Apr 2021, 06:39 last edited by
      #8

      @BDC_Patrick said in Building QT6 from Source failed (qtbase printsupport_autogen\timestamp):

      What do you mean exactly?

      Use MinGW wich you can install (probably already installed) through Qt Online Installer (or Qt Maintenance Tool) instead of C:\msys64\mingw64

      https://forum.qt.io/topic/113070/qt-code-of-conduct

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • B Offline
        B Offline
        BDC_Patrick
        wrote on 15 Apr 2021, 09:15 last edited by
        #9

        Yes.. i´ve installed QT6 Creator..

        So.. you said, that i don´t need to build it from Source to be used under LGPL..
        But, how to give the Users the Source after finishing.. is it stored locally somewhere in the QT Directories?

        J S 2 Replies Last reply 15 Apr 2021, 11:59
        0
        • B BDC_Patrick
          15 Apr 2021, 09:15

          Yes.. i´ve installed QT6 Creator..

          So.. you said, that i don´t need to build it from Source to be used under LGPL..
          But, how to give the Users the Source after finishing.. is it stored locally somewhere in the QT Directories?

          J Offline
          J Offline
          jsulm
          Lifetime Qt Champion
          wrote on 15 Apr 2021, 11:59 last edited by
          #10

          @BDC_Patrick said in Building QT6 from Source failed (qtbase printsupport_autogen\timestamp):

          So.. you said, that i don´t need to build it from Source

          Where?
          All I said (actually @SGaist) is that you should use MinGW provided through Qt Online Installer/Qt Maintenance Tool...

          https://forum.qt.io/topic/113070/qt-code-of-conduct

          B 1 Reply Last reply 15 Apr 2021, 12:17
          0
          • B BDC_Patrick
            15 Apr 2021, 09:15

            Yes.. i´ve installed QT6 Creator..

            So.. you said, that i don´t need to build it from Source to be used under LGPL..
            But, how to give the Users the Source after finishing.. is it stored locally somewhere in the QT Directories?

            S Offline
            S Offline
            SGaist
            Lifetime Qt Champion
            wrote on 15 Apr 2021, 12:16 last edited by
            #11

            @BDC_Patrick said in Building QT6 from Source failed (qtbase printsupport_autogen\timestamp):

            Yes.. i´ve installed QT6 Creator..

            So.. you said, that i don´t need to build it from Source to be used under LGPL..
            But, how to give the Users the Source after finishing.. is it stored locally somewhere in the QT Directories?

            There never was such a restriction.

            The online installer already provides Qt 6 pre-built binaries.

            Interested in AI ? www.idiap.ch
            Please read the Qt Code of Conduct - https://forum.qt.io/topic/113070/qt-code-of-conduct

            B 1 Reply Last reply 15 Apr 2021, 12:44
            0
            • J jsulm
              15 Apr 2021, 11:59

              @BDC_Patrick said in Building QT6 from Source failed (qtbase printsupport_autogen\timestamp):

              So.. you said, that i don´t need to build it from Source

              Where?
              All I said (actually @SGaist) is that you should use MinGW provided through Qt Online Installer/Qt Maintenance Tool...

              B Offline
              B Offline
              BDC_Patrick
              wrote on 15 Apr 2021, 12:17 last edited by
              #12

              @jsulm Yeah.. it was @jobor , my mistake.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • S SGaist
                15 Apr 2021, 12:16

                @BDC_Patrick said in Building QT6 from Source failed (qtbase printsupport_autogen\timestamp):

                Yes.. i´ve installed QT6 Creator..

                So.. you said, that i don´t need to build it from Source to be used under LGPL..
                But, how to give the Users the Source after finishing.. is it stored locally somewhere in the QT Directories?

                There never was such a restriction.

                The online installer already provides Qt 6 pre-built binaries.

                B Offline
                B Offline
                BDC_Patrick
                wrote on 15 Apr 2021, 12:44 last edited by
                #13

                @SGaist OK.. to be clear.. cause those license Stuff is beyond a normal human beings context.. :

                To fulfill the LGPL License, the binary QT (without Virt. Keyboard, Charts, Data Viz.. is absolutely OK..? Am I right there?
                What about the Source offering?

                And most: what if I want to keep my Application code private.. and not. open source..?

                J 1 Reply Last reply 15 Apr 2021, 12:56
                0
                • B BDC_Patrick
                  15 Apr 2021, 12:44

                  @SGaist OK.. to be clear.. cause those license Stuff is beyond a normal human beings context.. :

                  To fulfill the LGPL License, the binary QT (without Virt. Keyboard, Charts, Data Viz.. is absolutely OK..? Am I right there?
                  What about the Source offering?

                  And most: what if I want to keep my Application code private.. and not. open source..?

                  J Offline
                  J Offline
                  jsulm
                  Lifetime Qt Champion
                  wrote on 15 Apr 2021, 12:56 last edited by
                  #14

                  @BDC_Patrick LGPL is fine for closed source software. You only have to open source your changes to Qt itself if you do any. And you have to make sure users of your software can relink your softwareagainst their own Qt builds (easy if you use shared libs, for static builds you need to provide object files, but not source code!).

                  https://forum.qt.io/topic/113070/qt-code-of-conduct

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • D Offline
                    D Offline
                    dreckeffekt
                    wrote on 3 Nov 2021, 17:36 last edited by
                    #15

                    Hi, I know this topic is quite old but I'm currently having the same issue (I'm also quite new when it comes to all of this).

                    I get the same error at different steps in the build, so the module does not seem to matter, but it always fails at a [some module]_autogen\timestamp.
                    While I'll have to confirm this, I think this might have something to do with the ninja multi-config generator that's used when setting the '-debug-and-release' flag on configure.bat, as this doesn't seem to happen when only building for Release configuration. Does anyone have a fix for this or did switching the compiler work for you @BDC_Patrick ?

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • N Offline
                      N Offline
                      Niyas Sait
                      wrote on 5 Mar 2022, 21:45 last edited by
                      #16

                      Hi, I am running into the same issue, Is there any solution for this?

                      My Environment:

                      Host and Target: Windows 11 / Arm64 ( Surface Pro)
                      Compiler: MSVC v142
                      Commit: Tag v6.2.3 and a9c9418c(dev HEAD)
                      CMake: 3.21.4
                      Python: 3.10.0
                      Ninja: 1.10.2

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • M Offline
                        M Offline
                        maisoui
                        wrote on 11 Aug 2022, 08:51 last edited by
                        #17

                        Hi,

                        same problem here. I tried unsuccessfully different versions of CMAKE.
                        Has anyone found the solution? I really need to build Qt from sources.

                        Regards

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • H Offline
                          H Offline
                          habersaa
                          wrote on 12 Mar 2024, 07:42 last edited by
                          #18

                          Hey.
                          We are experiencing the same issues with ninja and MSVC2019, but on another big Qt/QML project that we are building with Qt 6.6.0. On the CI, one every 3-5 build fails with this error related to timestamp.

                          Do anyone have an idea how to debug/avoid this issue ?

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • A Offline
                            A Offline
                            avautour
                            wrote on 18 Jun 2025, 15:53 last edited by
                            #19

                            I know this is an old post, but I figured I'd add this information as I ran into it.

                            I don't think it is related to autogen or timestamps, I believe it is related to precompiled header files in general, because some of the failures I ran into had nothing to do with autogen, even thought some of them did:

                            /Fdqtbase\src\openglwidgets\CMakeFiles\OpenGLWidgets.dir\ /FS -c qtbase\src\openglwidgets\CMakeFiles\OpenGLWidgets.dir\cmake_pch.cxx Microsoft (R) C/C++ Optimizing Compiler Version 19.29.30153 for x64 Copyright (C) Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. ninja: build stopped: subcommand failed.

                            11:55:53 [836/4092] Building CXX object qtlanguageserver\src\jsonrpc\CMakeFiles\JsonRpcPrivate.dir\cmake_pch.cxx.obj 11:55:53 [837/4092] Building CXX object qtgrpc\src\protobuf\CMakeFiles\Protobuf.dir\cmake_pch.cxx.obj 11:55:53 [838/4092] Building CXX object qtserialport\src\serialport\CMakeFiles\SerialPort.dir\cmake_pch.cxx.obj 11:55:53 [839/4092] Building CXX object qtconnectivity\src\nfc\CMakeFiles\Nfc.dir\cmake_pch.cxx.obj 11:55:53 ninja: build stopped: subcommand failed.

                            I was able to work-around it by disabling precompiled headers files by adding -DCMAKE_DISABLE_PRECOMPILE_HEADERS=ON to the CMake generation step. I was using the CMake with Visual Studio 2019 ( 3.20.21032501-MSVC_2) on Qt 6.7.3.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0

                            • Login

                            • Login or register to search.
                            • First post
                              Last post
                            0
                            • Categories
                            • Recent
                            • Tags
                            • Popular
                            • Users
                            • Groups
                            • Search
                            • Get Qt Extensions
                            • Unsolved