QWS VNC doesn't work on Portrait mode
-
@SGaist Below the patch code, I see
QPoint tpos; // Main screen QSize s = QSize(qt_screen->deviceWidth(), qt_screen->deviceHeight()); tpos = qt_screen->mapFromDevice(pos, s); // Sub screens QList<QScreen*> screens = qt_screen->subScreens(); if (screens.size()) { for (int i = 0; i < screens.size(); ++i) { QScreen *screen = screens.at(i); QSize s = QSize(screen->deviceWidth(), screen->deviceHeight()); tpos = screen->mapFromDevice(pos, s); break; } } if (qt_last_x) { *qt_last_x = tpos.x(); *qt_last_y = tpos.y(); } QWSServer::mousePosition = tpos; qwsServerPrivate->mouseState = state;We use the tpos and mouse the mousePosition just once. Even though, we have many subscreens, we just do it once.
Is this correct?
Should we not do this in a loop for all the screens?
Please let me know.
Looks like I am in a wrong direction.
I suspect "Transformed" driver is not having problem.
I think, it is "multi" screen driver is what not working good.
Because, when VNC option is selected, Transformed works food.
When LinuxFb is selected, Transformed works good.When both are used, there lies the problem.
I guess, we may have to look at Multi Screen driver source code to see how it has been implemented.
Can you please point me to the right location?
Thanks,
Kumara -
I'd take a look a the qscreenmulti_qws.cpp file
-
@SGaist Oh!
Any thing you found? -
@SGaist Later I gave a try with
export QWS_DISPLAY="VNC:Transformed:Rot270"I dont know the magic behind this.
In my LCD display UI, looks good. And even touch works well.
And now, in the VNC client, Application was rotated. So, I used RealVNC client and rotated the screen to 270.
With that, UI looks good and even operation works well.I dont know what magic behind the scene.
But the problem I see is, display refresh in VNC client. The screen doesnt gets refreshed. There is a hug lag while updating the screen..
I am totally confused now, to understand the problem.
Based on your experience,
Where do you see the problem?Thanks a lot for your immense support!
-
90 and 270 are "complementary" meaning that 270 is equivalent to -90 so it might be that the position calculation were done wrong (or just not taking the angle in account correctly)
Do you mean that with 90, the refreshing is done correctly on both but not the mouse handling and with 270, the refreshing is wrong but the mouse move are handled correctly ?
-
90 and 270 are "complementary" meaning that 270 is equivalent to -90 so it might be that the position calculation were done wrong (or just not taking the angle in account correctly)
Do you mean that with 90, the refreshing is done correctly on both but not the mouse handling and with 270, the refreshing is wrong but the mouse move are handled correctly ?
@SGaist No. With both 90 or 270, I can see the mouse move is perfect. But the refreshing is not working good.
-
90 and 270 are "complementary" meaning that 270 is equivalent to -90 so it might be that the position calculation were done wrong (or just not taking the angle in account correctly)
Do you mean that with 90, the refreshing is done correctly on both but not the mouse handling and with 270, the refreshing is wrong but the mouse move are handled correctly ?
@SGaist Sam, any further thoughts?
I don't want to give up. I want to fix this Qt bug. For sure, I will need your / Qt experts help.
Thank you,
Kumara -
@SGaist Sam, any further thoughts?
I don't want to give up. I want to fix this Qt bug. For sure, I will need your / Qt experts help.
Thank you,
KumaraStill no success so far.
Any thoughts on how to handle this?
Thank you!
Kumara -
Can you remind me the current "multiscreen" setup you have ?
