<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[PyQt]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">I notice that PySide is specifically called out in this subforum.  Is pyside the only blessed python binding discussed here, or are PyQt discussions also welcome?</p>
<p dir="auto">Personally I only use PyQt because it's what I started playing with years ago.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.qt.io/topic/164452/pyqt</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 04:16:54 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.qt.io/topic/164452.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2026 04:05:02 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to PyQt on Thu, 19 Mar 2026 14:05:04 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/j.hilk">@<bdi>J.Hilk</bdi></a> said in <a href="/post/837184">PyQt</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">I know I don't like that as well, but at least it reduced the confusion between Qt and QtCreator versions by an order of magnitude in posts here on the platform</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">Not sure what you mean.  I started at Qt5 a few years ago.  We are now at Qt6.  Meanwhile <strong>Creator</strong> went from something like major version 4 to major version 19, or thereabouts.  I can't really see much has even changed in it (at least for my usage; and for me it has about the same number of major bugs/annoyances as it did at version 4, no improvements in lots of those).  Certainly not enough to justify ~15 major version increments.  If this were any other product than Qt, which I do love, I would not touch it with a bargepole if it need to undergo so many, frequent major version numbers.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.qt.io/post/837185</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.qt.io/post/837185</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[JonB]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2026 14:05:04 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to PyQt on Thu, 19 Mar 2026 13:57:32 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/jonb">@<bdi>JonB</bdi></a> said in <a href="/post/837183">PyQt</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">I know :) It was just that it was a jump of 4! Still nowhere near keeping up with the current major versions of Creator, which is one of my bug bears....!</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">I know I don't like that as well, but at least it reduced the confusion between Qt and QtCreator versions by an order of magnitude in posts here on the platform</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.qt.io/post/837184</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.qt.io/post/837184</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[J.Hilk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2026 13:57:32 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to PyQt on Thu, 19 Mar 2026 12:28:57 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/sgaist">@<bdi>SGaist</bdi></a> said in <a href="/post/837179">PyQt</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">Small note, the jump from 2 to 6, has nothing to do with major versions, it was just to make it match the Qt version.</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">I know :)  It was just that it was a jump of 4!  Still nowhere near keeping up with the current major versions of <strong>Creator</strong>, which is one of my bug bears....!</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.qt.io/post/837183</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.qt.io/post/837183</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[JonB]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2026 12:28:57 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to PyQt on Thu, 19 Mar 2026 10:18:36 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/kent-dorfman">@<bdi>Kent-Dorfman</bdi></a> hi,</p>
<p dir="auto">I concur with <a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/jonb">@<bdi>JonB</bdi></a>, questions around PyQt have been around for a long time and there is no problem with that.</p>
<p dir="auto">I memory serves well, we renamed the category to Qt for Python to make it more generic when PySide6 was released as for a very long time only PyQt was available.</p>
<p dir="auto">Small note, the jump from 2 to 6, has nothing to do with major versions, it was just to make it match the Qt version.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.qt.io/post/837179</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.qt.io/post/837179</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[SGaist]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2026 10:18:36 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to PyQt on Thu, 19 Mar 2026 08:15:51 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">PyQt questions are fine and are best posted to this forum, I would suggest.  Both bindings can be discussed here.</p>
<p dir="auto">I started Qt with PyQt (now use C++).  Then it was PySide2 vs PyQt5, and PySide2 just wasn't up to it, loads of "holes".  The jump of 4 major releases to PySide6 sure helped, and now from what I can tell it is just about as good as PyQt6.</p>
<p dir="auto">There are times with a very specific PyQt question that we have to refer to people to the riverbank mailing list for further information.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.qt.io/post/837176</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.qt.io/post/837176</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[JonB]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2026 08:15:51 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>