Wiki Discussion

So, now I'm back.

bq. She is pisces sign?

Yes, indeed she is!

bq. It’s good, if you email me I can provide you a decent ftp (home nas for personal use) access to share what can’t be fit in a hosted projects.forum.nokia.com while for the other stuff I create a nokia project. You can be of the team developer crew :)

Ok, this can we do. Which toolchain do you need, x86 or arm? I've got both, with integreated Qt. That means, you can use that toolchain direct without anything else. The x86 version is build with Qt 4.7.0, will be updated propably soon. The arm version is build with Qt 4.7.2, so it's brand new.

And on monday I'm back at work. So let me know, if you are interested in!

you are welcome ...

but just for the record: "me and wiki" here goes :p
"https://developer.qt.nokia.com/forums/viewthread/1229/#7157":https://developer.qt.nokia.com/forums/viewthread/1229/#7157

I really like the way java tutorials have been made available. you will have seen it: "http://download.oracle.com/javase/tutorial/":http://download.oracle.com/javase/tutorial/

See "here":http://developer.qt.nokia.com/wiki/WikiHelp#65328509491e12c05fae9f49077c6da0 (if you need, on page top are many links to other language versions of this page)

[quote author="mairas" date="1295532109"]OK, reported:

http://bugreports.qt.nokia.com/browse/QTWEBSITE-179
[/quote]

Thanks!

It's a bit of a tricky question. So far, the biggest chunk of content is about developing applications with Qt as opposed to developing Qt itself.

"Qt Development" felt pretty clear to me (similar to "Web Development" for example). I am not sure if we don't confuse more people by naming the category like this which is dealing with the development of the libraries themselves...

In conclusion: I don't know either. At least not right now. If you can give me some time, chances are good that it changes. :P

[quote author="Volker" date="1295262975"]But why not let the computer do the work instead of manually searching for the changes. In the email diff you can check if the change is important for you or just, say, corrects some whitespace or spelling error. I would definitely prefer the more verbose email.[/quote]

The server is already doing a bit of it: http://developer.qt.nokia.com/wiki/diff/Wiki_Home_French. You see that I just changed something in the last paragraph. That's the most important; however, a full diff by email would be definitely better.

Also, you made me think of something else: it could be useful to have a Minor edit button when editing, to say that we're not changing the whole article, just correcting a typo or so (just like Wikipedia, for example). And the subscribers would have the choice of being notified of such minor edits or no.

I kept those pages during December to see if anything is added to them but that was not the case. I agree that they can go.

I will go and delete them.

I've split that article into 5 smaller ones, here it is: http://developer.qt.nokia.com/wiki/PySide_Binding_Generation_Tutorial.

Just to update everyone on the matter before I quietly change stuff...

I am under the impression that the ones who care prefer spaces in titles (or underscores in the URL), so we'll just go for that.

For everybody else it shouldn't matter anyway. :-P

[quote author="mohsen" date="1294387998"]To write articles in Persian. By default it shows like crab and frog![/quote]

Right, we know that. Support for rtl text is on the list. Thanks for your patience.

Thanks for asking! ;)

Thanks... I assume that was the case but wanted to double check.

Let me shed some light on the syntax issue here.

[[Category:Tools::QtCreator_Spanish|Español]] will create a sub-category "QtCreator_Spanish" within the category "Tools" and display "Español" as clickable link. The page this is used in will be automatically sorted into said sub-category

[[:Category:Tools::QtCreator_Spanish|Español]] will only link to the sub-category.

It looks exactly the same on the page, so it's easy to confuse. :)

Thanks Alexandra for your detailed answer, I totally agree with you in everything and thanks for the clearing up that I haven't written fully clearly.

And welcome back after the holidays :)

Thanks guys! So linking pages using wiki syntax is the right solution. well!

If anybody get some updates about this, please post it here or somewhere where everybody notice it, because I'm interested in this too, and I think many other people. Thanks :)

Hi,

I agree with Volker, the shorter, the better. So something like [wiki:hu] is best, that's why I voted something other

The only issue is that only a very few people can tell you if eg. a Hungarian wiki article is ready or not (eg. I filled all planned paragraphs with blah-blah like text as a placeholder).

[ADDED]I am playing the devil"s advocate role here, but I completely agree with the intention to somehow clean up the wiki